Seeding Biomaterials: Biobased Materials for West Michigan

Seeding Biomaterials explores how West Michigan's agricultural byproducts can become regenerative, biobased materials — supporting local innovation and replacing petrochemical plastic packaging.

Challenge

Petrochemical plastics pollute every marine and terrestrial ecosystem, emit greenhouse gases throughout their life cycles, and are now found in human blood. Alongside reduction, reuse and recycling, the world needs plastic-free alternatives.

‍

In sectors such as packaging and textiles, fully biobased materials made from sustainably sourced biomass, including industry byproducts and waste, can offer that alternative and can be composted at end-of-life to improve soil health.

‍

Approach

This project supports businesses in Grand Rapids to develop fully biobased, compostable plastics from local organic waste. It builds on a 2022 study, supported by the Wege Foundation, that explored which compostable biobased plastics could be made from regenerative agriculture byproducts.

‍

Working with the Michigan Sustainable Business Forum (MiSBF) and local partners, the project:

  • Identifies usable organic waste streams in the West Michigan area from agricultural byproducts
  • Prototypes and showcases biobased packaging materials from these feedstocks
  • Identifies value chains to support continued innovation of biobased materials

‍

‍

Two researchers working with biomass samples beside the Materiom Commons dashboard

‍

Outcomes

The project's main output is an open toolkit that follows one continuous thread — from the region's biomass, to the biopolymers locked inside it, to the material properties they enable, and on to the recipes and resources that put them to work. The figures are interactive — hover, sort and filter to explore the data.

‍

01 Biomass & Biopolymers

Every year, processing the region's crops and animals leaves behind enormous volumes of organic waste — and locked inside it are the biopolymers that next-generation materials are made from. This map dimensions what is going to waste, and what could be recovered.

‍

Each bar is one year of production for a single feedstock, in US short tons. The darker portion is the crop or product that reaches its market; the coral portion is the processing residue left over — the fraction available as biomaterial feedstock.

‍

Annual agricultural production, and what it leaves behind

‍

Product to market Processing waste

‍

Figure 1. Production per feedstock in US short tons; coral marks processing waste.

‍

Each band's thickness is the indicative yield, in US short tons, reported for one biopolymer from one feedstock, routed to the molecular family it belongs to. Band widths show relative scale; they are not additive.

‍

From biomass to biopolymer families

‍

‍

Figure 2. Band thickness is the indicative yield of one biopolymer from one feedstock.

‍

Every bar is normalised to full width so the recipes can be compared directly; the bands inside it are the indicative yields reported for each biopolymer as a share of that waste stream. Only material-making molecules are mapped — the polymers, proteins, minerals and waxes that can be formed into a material — so the grey remainder is water, sugars burned as energy, and everything else outside that scope. Switch to absolute tonnage to compare volumes rather than recipes.

‍

Waste per feedstock, split by biopolymer

‍

‍

Figure 3. Indicative biopolymer yields as a share of each waste stream.

‍

Each tile is one biopolymer, sized by the summed indicative yields reported for it across all 30 feedstocks, in US short tons. Tile areas compare molecules against one another — they do not describe a quantity that could be recovered together.

‍

Potentially available biopolymers in local biomass waste

‍

‍

Figure 4. Tile area is the summed indicative yield of each biopolymer.

‍

For each waste feedstock, explore the primary biopolymers that can be extracted according to their estimated concentration.

‍

Molecular composition & concentration by biomass waste

‍

‍

Figure 5. Primary extractable biopolymers per feedstock.

‍

02 Applications & Properties

Once you know which biopolymers a feedstock yields, the next question is what they can do. Filter the dataset by biomass source or application to see the material properties, mappings, and real-world brand examples for each biopolymer.

‍

Explore the applications that each natural ingredient can be used for, together with the properties that each ingredient can play a role in.

‍

Relevant biopolymer properties for material applications

‍

Biomass source
Application
⌕
19 of 19 Click a molecule for details

‍

Figure 6. Biopolymer roles across material applications.

‍

03 Starting Material Recipes

From properties to practice: open recipes for making the materials, and the resources to help innovators and producers put them to work.

‍

Developed for the project, these material formulations leverage the regional availability of local agricultural waste, mainly focusing on derivatives from apple mash, spent grain/yeast, dairy products, and poultry byproducts.

‍

Consequently, this drives the primary utilisation of biopolymers like cellulose, methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, gelatin, whey, and casein. This supply was strategically aligned with the requirements of local stakeholders, who sought the development of composite and film formats tailored for foodware, food packaging, and furniture packaging.

‍

Biobased materials developed for the Seeding Biomaterials project

‍

RECIPE 1 PEC2% Pectin Film Single Layer Film 30 minutes
Tools neededHotplate with magnetic stirrer, beaker, pH meter, casting tray / silicone molds, dehydrator
Packaging propertiesSemi-transparent to translucent with low surface gloss; high tensile flexibility with moderate tear resistance; excellent oxygen barrier, moisture sensitive. Best for dry food wraps, inner confectionery liners, heat-sealable bio-pouches.
Ingredients
Pectin — 20.0 gFiltered water — 400 mLGlycerol (plasticizer) — 3.2 gPotassium sorbate (antifungal) — 0.5 g
Processing
1 · Heating & hydration. Heat 400 mL water to 70–80°C. Slowly add 20.0 g Pectin under continuous stirring (1000 rpm) to avoid clumping until fully dissolved (15–20 min).2 · Plasticizer incorporation. Add 3.2 g Glycerol directly to the clear pectin solution and stir for 10–15 min at temperature.3 · Antifungal addition. Add 0.5 g Potassium Sorbate to the warm solution (70–80°C) and stir for 5 min. Verify pH is below 6.0.4 · Degassing & casting. Allow solution to rest at 40°C to release air bubbles. Cast into Teflon or silicone molds.
DryingDehydrator at 35°C for 8 h, followed by ambient drying at 25°C.

‍

Figure 7. Six starting recipes, with tools, properties and processing steps.

‍

Nine open-access formulations from the Materiom Commons that build on the same biopolymer families found in the region's waste streams. Each links back to the full recipe, with process steps, properties, and contributor notes.

‍

Materials from Materiom Commons library

‍

‍

Figure 8. Related formulations in the Materiom Commons library.

‍

Further Reading

Courses, masterclasses, reports, and databases for moving into bio-based material development.

‍

‍

04 Seeding Biomaterials project partners

The project is a collaboration between Materiom, the Wege Foundation and the West Michigan Sustainable Business Forum.

‍

Learn more

  • Contact us if you're interested in the dataset and methodology.

‍

Cover image: Materiom

More from Materiom